I heard an interesting story in a workshop a few weeks ago and I have been pondering it off and on since that time. I did a little research and it appears to be valid.
It is the story of the development of the typewriter. The original layout of the keyboard had to be altered because of the design of the machine. If the keys were laid out logically and efficiently, the potential typing speed led to stuck keys. Thus, the keyboard had to be designed in such a way as to separate the frequently used keys so that it would slow the typist down enough that the keys would not stick.
With the invention of the electronic typewriter, this design flaw was remedied, but by then, the keyboard layout was ingrained in our culture and any change to make it more efficient has been defeated. Now days, we don’t even use typewriters anymore. We sit at computers and type onto a screen. But guess how that keyboard you are typing on is laid out – you guessed it – the same way it was over 120 years ago.
Here is the question: Why is it that even when we know a change would be beneficial and make us more efficient do we resist the change?
Can this reality be seen in the church? You bet! We get comfortable and the “way we have always done it” gets ingrained in our culture.
Here is the challenge for today: If the church is God’s plan to offer hope and love to a hurting world (and we know there is no plan B), then shouldn’t we do everything in our power to be constantly striving to improve how we minister?
Something to think about.
Leave a Reply